Case 86 / 183 Analyst

PE Due Diligence: What Matters Most

LBO & Private Equity

The prompt

“You're in a private equity interview and the partner asks: "We're three weeks out from an Investment Committee meeting on a platform acquisition, and our diligence budget only covers two of the three major workstreams in full — commercial, financial, and operational. Which two do you prioritize, and does your answer change if I tell you we're a generalist buyout fund versus a sector-focused operational investor?" Walk me through how you would prioritize commercial, financial, and operational due diligence under time pressure, and explain how the priority order shifts depending on the type of PE firm running the deal.”

📋 What you're given

You're in a private equity interview and the partner asks: "We're three weeks out from an Investment Committee meeting on a platform acquisition, and our diligence budget only covers two of the three major workstreams in full — commercial, financial, and operational. Which two do you prioritize, and does your answer change if I tell you we're a generalist buyout fund versus a sector-focused operational investor?" Walk me through how you would prioritize commercial, financial, and operational due diligence under time pressure, and explain how the priority order shifts depending on the type of PE firm running the deal.

1. Task Overview

Task: determine how to prioritize commercial, financial, and operational due diligence under a tight diligence timeline, and explain how the right priority order changes depending on what kind of private equity firm is running the deal.

Step 1: Given Data — An Illustrative Platform Deal

Use this illustrative deal to ground the prioritization frameworks below.

AttributeDescription
TargetRegional industrial components manufacturer, ~$180m revenue, ~$28m EBITDA
ProcessCompetitive auction; Investment Committee (IC) meeting in three weeks
Diligence BudgetEnough time and advisor capacity to fully complete only two of the three major workstreams (Commercial, Financial, Operational) before IC; the third can only be scoped at a high level
Bidder AGeneralist mid-market buyout fund, first deal in this specific sub-sector
Bidder BSector-focused operational investor with six prior industrials platform deals

Step 2: Commercial Due Diligence Priority

Show Commercial DD Framework

Commercial DD = Market Growth & Structure + Customer Concentration & Retention + Competitive Position + Pricing Power

Using this framework, assess how much weight commercial due diligence deserves on this deal.

Step 3: Financial Due Diligence Priority

Show Financial DD Framework

Financial DD = Quality of Earnings (normalized EBITDA) + Working Capital Normalization + Debt Capacity Read-Through

Using this framework, assess how much weight financial due diligence deserves on this deal.

Step 4: Operational Due Diligence Priority

Show Operational DD Framework

Operational DD = Cost Structure & Efficiency + Capacity Utilization + Key Person & Systems Risk + Scalability of the Platform

Using this framework, assess how much weight operational due diligence deserves on this deal.

Step 5: Prioritizing Under Time Pressure, by Firm Type

Show Prioritization Framework

Priority Workstream = Diligence Area That Most Directly Tests the Firm's Specific Value Creation Thesis

Assume:

  • Bidder A (generalist) underwrites primarily on financial engineering and entry multiple discipline, without a differentiated, pre-tested operational playbook
  • Bidder B (sector-focused operational investor) underwrites primarily on a specific operational improvement plan it has already run successfully at prior platforms
  • Both bidders can defer their lowest-priority workstream to a lighter, high-level review pre-signing and complete it as confirmatory diligence post-signing

Using these assumptions, determine which two workstreams each bidder should prioritize, and which one each can defer.

💡 Model answer

Try answering out loud first — then reveal the model answer and compare.

⚠️ Common mistakes

  • Treating all three DD workstreams as equally weighted regardless of firm type or sector, instead of prioritizing based on the specific investment thesis.
  • Assuming financial DD (quality of earnings) is always the single top priority by default — for a sector specialist with a proven operational playbook, operational DD often carries just as much weight.
  • Forgetting that a deprioritized workstream still needs a high-level scope before signing — not skipping it entirely until after close.
  • Confusing "generalist vs. sector-focused" with "less experienced vs. more experienced" — the real distinction is a differentiated, pre-tested thesis, not seniority.
  • Ignoring that commercial DD risk varies hugely by sector — mature industrials and high-growth tech or consumer targets require very different levels of commercial scrutiny.

🔁 Follow-up questions

➡️ Related cases

Previous Case 85: Management Incentivization and ESOP

⭐ Rate this case

0 ratings

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet — be the first to ask a question.

Part of a 183-case learning path. Create a free account to save progress & unlock follow-up answers.
Create free account