Variant of CapEx vs. D&A: A Manufacturer Mid-Expansion — Tech / Software Variant
DCF
“Now look at a software company with the same $1.2B revenue and the same 22% EBITDA margin as the manufacturer. Walk me through why its CapEx and D&A barely move the needle on Free Cash Flow — and what would change that.”
Software companies don't buy factories or machinery, so it's tempting to assume their CapEx is close to zero. That's not quite right — CapEx still exists, it just comes from different sources than a manufacturer's PP&E line:
This case focuses on the first two, since that's where the real industry contrast with the manufacturer lives.
Same revenue and margin as the manufacturer, very different capital structure:
| Manufacturer | Software company | |
|---|---|---|
| Total CapEx | $150M (Year 1–2) | $30M |
| CapEx as % of revenue | 12.5% | 2.5% |
| D&A | $50M | ≈$25M |
| D&A as % of revenue | 4.2% | ≈2.1% |
| CapEx − D&A | +$100M | ≈+$5M |
Unlevered FCF = EBIT × (1 − Tax Rate) + D&A − CapEx − Increase in NWC
Annual Amortization = Capitalized Development Cost ÷ Useful Life ($30M ÷ 3 = $10M/year)
Try answering out loud first — then reveal the model answer and compare.