LBO Screening in Practice: Is MILES Car-Sharing a Good Investment?

Variant of What Makes a Good LBO Target? — Real Interview Variant — MILES Mobility (Car-Sharing)

LBO

The prompt

“In a real interview, you're asked: "Would MILES — the German kilometer-based car-sharing service — be a good investment?" Walk me through your assessment, purely qualitatively, without needing any specific financial figures.”

📋 What you're given

As a credit analyst, you are asked to identify a company's off-balance-sheet financing arrangements — such as special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and synthetic leases — and reclassify them onto the balance sheet to reveal the company's true leverage.

1. Task Overview

Task: compute the company's reported Debt/EBITDA ratio, then reclassify two off-balance-sheet arrangements (an SPV and a synthetic lease) onto the balance sheet to compute the company's true, adjusted leverage — explaining why each arrangement actually qualifies for reclassification, not just plugging numbers into a formula.

Step 1: Given Data — Reported Financials and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

The company's reported financial statements and two disclosed (but unconsolidated) financing arrangements are as follows.

Line ItemValue
Reported Total Debt (on balance sheet)$300m
Reported EBITDA$100m
SPV Debt (financing a receivables securitization, off-balance-sheet)$200m
Company retains first-loss risk on the SPV's receivables?Yes
Company has power to direct the SPV's key decisions (servicing, collections)?Yes
Synthetic Lease — PV of remaining lease payments$50m
Synthetic lease includes a bargain purchase option at lease-end?Yes (below expected fair market value)

Step 2: Determine Whether the SPV Must Be Consolidated

A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV, also called a Special Purpose Entity or Variable Interest Entity/VIE) is a separate legal entity a company sets up to isolate specific assets and liabilities — often to raise financing without that debt showing up on the sponsoring company's own balance sheet. Whether the SPV's debt has to be added back depends on a control-and-risk test, not on who legally owns the SPV's equity.

Show VIE Consolidation Test

Consolidate the SPV if: Company has the power to direct the SPV's most significant activities AND Company absorbs the majority of the SPV's losses or benefits (the "primary beneficiary" test under VIE / ASC 810 rules)

Using this test, determine whether the SPV's $200m of debt belongs on the company's balance sheet, and if so, add it to Reported Debt.

Step 3: Determine Whether the Synthetic Lease Is Economically Debt

A synthetic lease is a lease structured so that, for accounting purposes, it qualifies as an operating lease (keeping the leased asset and its associated financing off the balance sheet), while for tax purposes the lessee is treated as the owner (allowing it to claim depreciation deductions). Whether it is really a financing arrangement in economic substance depends on who bears the risks and rewards of ownership.

Show Synthetic Lease Reclassification Formula

Adjusted Debt = Reported Debt + SPV Debt (if consolidated) + PV of Synthetic Lease Payments (if the lease transfers substantially all risks and rewards of ownership, e.g. via a bargain purchase option)

Using this formula, compute the company's fully adjusted debt figure.

Step 4: Compute Adjusted Leverage

Show Leverage Ratio Formula

Debt/EBITDA = Total Debt / EBITDA

Assume:

  • EBITDA is unaffected by the reclassification (the underlying operations don't change, only how the financing is recognized)
  • No additional interest expense or tax shield is layered into this exercise — the focus is the leverage ratio itself, not net income

Using these inputs, compute both the reported and the adjusted Debt/EBITDA ratios and compare them.

💡 Model answer

Try answering out loud first — then reveal the model answer and compare.

⚠️ Common mistakes

  • Assuming "market leader" automatically means "good LBO target" — scale and cash flow predictability are different things.
  • Overlooking capital intensity because the company looks asset-light on headcount, when the vehicle fleet itself is the dominant capital cost.
  • Confusing brand recognition and scale with pricing power in a category where users compare apps trip by trip.
  • Trying to force a numeric answer when the question was explicitly asked — and should be answered — qualitatively.
  • Forgetting that "good business" and "good LBO target" are two different questions — a strong, well-run company can still be a poor fit for a highly levered capital structure.

🔁 Follow-up questions

➡️ Related cases

⭐ Rate this case

0 ratings

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet — be the first to ask a question.

Create free account