Case 78 / 183 Entry

MoM and IRR Calculation

LBO & Private Equity

The prompt

“As a private equity associate, walk me through how to calculate the Multiple of Money (MoM) and the IRR for a leveraged buyout investment. What's the quick mental-math rule of thumb linking the two, and what returns do investors typically target?”

📋 What you're given

As a private equity associate, walk me through how to calculate the Multiple of Money (MoM) and the IRR for a leveraged buyout investment. What's the quick mental-math rule of thumb linking the two, and what returns do investors typically target?

1. Task Overview

Task: calculate the MoM and IRR for the investment below, then check the result against the standard mental-math rule of thumb PE investors use to sanity-check returns.

Step 1: Given Data — Investment Terms

A sponsor has just exited the following leveraged buyout investment.

Line ItemValue
Initial Equity Investment$100m
Exit Equity Proceeds$300m
Holding Period5 years

Step 2: Multiple of Money (MoM)

Show MoM Formula

MoM = Exit Equity Proceeds / Initial Equity Investment

Using this formula, compute the Multiple of Money.

Step 3: Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Show IRR Formula

IRR = MoM^(1/n) - 1

Using this formula, compute the annualized IRR.

Step 4: Sanity-Check Against the Rule of Thumb

PE investors often use a quick mental-math benchmark to sanity-check IRR during a live discussion, without reaching for a calculator.

Show Rule of Thumb

5-Year Holding Period Rule of Thumb: 2x ≈ 15% IRR, 3x ≈ 25% IRR, 4x ≈ 32% IRR

Using this benchmark, confirm whether your calculated IRR aligns with the standard rule of thumb for this holding period.

💡 Model answer

Try answering out loud first — then reveal the model answer and compare.

⚠️ Common mistakes

  • Confusing MoM (a simple cash multiple that ignores time) with IRR (a time-adjusted annual return) — reporting only one gives an incomplete picture of performance.
  • Inverting the IRR exponent — using MoM^n instead of MoM^(1/n) — which produces a nonsensical result far outside any realistic return range.
  • Treating the mental-math rule of thumb as an exact formula rather than an approximation that only holds cleanly for round multiples and standard 5-year holding periods.
  • Assuming MoM already accounts for the time value of money, when in fact it is entirely time-agnostic.
  • Using the simple two-point MoM/IRR formula for deals with interim cash flows (dividend recaps, partial exits), when those situations require a full cash-flow-based (XIRR-style) calculation instead.

🔁 Follow-up questions

➡️ Related cases

Previous Case 77: Sources and Uses Table

⭐ Rate this case

0 ratings

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet — be the first to ask a question.

Part of a 183-case learning path. Create a free account to save progress & unlock follow-up answers.
Create free account